IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 29, 2011
STEWART MANAGO, PLAINTIFF,
BRAD WILLIAMS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge
For the reasons stated in this court's order filed December 16, 2011 (Dkt. No. 206), plaintiff's motion to compel, filed December 27, 2011 (Dkt. No. 210), is denied. Plaintiff's separate motion, filed December 22, 2011 (Dkt. No. 208), to compel defendants' counsel to provide plaintiff with a copy of the transcript of plaintiff's February 11, 2011 deposition, is also denied. On October 28, 2011, defendants lodged with the court a copy of the subject transcript, that includes a three-page "Errata Sheet" prepared and signed by plaintiff on March 31, 2011, thus indicating that plaintiff already has a copy of the subject transcript. (Dkt. No. 182.) For the reasons stated in the court's prior order, plaintiff shall refrain from filing any further documents in this court, or from corresponding with defense counsel, without prior court authorization.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.