IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 30, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney HENRY Z. CARBAJAL III Assistant United States Attorney United States Courthouse 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: (559) 497-4000 Facsimile: (559) 497-4099 Attorneys for the United States of America
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS
CONFERENCE; ORDER THEREON
Date: March 12, 2012 Time: 9:00 a.m.
Dept: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the status conference for defendant JUAN SOLORIO-MENDOZA, in the above-referenced action now scheduled for January 17, 2012, at 1:00 p.m. is continued to March 12, 2012, at 1:00 p.m.
The continuance of the status conference is being requested by the parties to allow the government to obtain additional discovery from the state law enforcement agencies involved in the defendant's arrest. The government has made efforts to obtain the referenced discovery, which was identified in a prior stipulation to continue a past status conference, but additional time is required to effectuate the compliance of the arresting agencies. The discovery is necessary to resolve a potential sentencing issue that would have a significant effect on the incarceration period the defendant would be facing upon being found guilty of the crime charged in the indictment.
The parties agree that the time between the filing of this stipulation and the new status conference date on March 12, 2012 shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).
Good Cause exists for the continuance. Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.