Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re Tft-Lcd (Flat Panel) Antitrust v. Au Optronics

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


January 4, 2012

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.
v.
AU OPTRONICS
CORPORATION, ET AL.,

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Illston, United States District Judge

Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice) Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) 2 CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 3 Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: 202-624-2500 4 Facsimile: 202-628-5116 Email: jhoward@crowell.com 5 jmurphy@crowell.com 6 Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214) 7 CROWELL & MORING LLP 515 South Flower St., 40th Floor 8 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213-622-4750 9 Facsimile: 213-622-2690 Email: jmurray@crowell.com 10 jstokes@crowell.com 11 Counsel for Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc. [Additional counsel listed on signature page] 12 13

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY

Defendants Chi Mei Corp., Chimei Innolux Corp. ("Chimei Innolux"); Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co. Ltd.; Nexgen Mediatech, Inc.; Nexgen 3 Mediatech USA, Inc. (collectively, "Chi Mei") and Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc. ("Motorola") 4 stipulate as follows: 5

WHEREAS Motorola served a Set of Interrogatories on Chi Mei and a set of Requests for Production of Documents on Chimei Innolux on November 4, 2011 (the "Discovery"); 7

WHEREAS Chi Mei provided Responses and Objections to the Discovery on December 8, 2011;

WHEREAS the parties are meeting and conferring regarding Chi Mei's Responses and Objections to the Discovery; 11

WHEREAS Chi Mei previously agreed to permit Motorola additional time to move to 12 compel further responses to the Discovery and the Court entered an Order on December 16, 2011 13 setting January 6, 2012 as the deadline to file motions to compel as to the Discovery; 14

WHEREAS the parties desire additional time to meet and confer to resolve their disputes 15 regarding the Discovery, and Chi Mei has agreed to provide Motorola additional time to move to 16 compel. 17

THEREFORE, Chi Mei and Motorola, by their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate 18 and agree as follows: 19

The deadline for Motorola to move to compel further responses to the Discovery shall be 2 extended to January 20, 2012. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120104

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.