Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Daniel Call, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Wells Fargo & Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION


January 5, 2012

DANIEL CALL, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Claudia Wilken United States District Judge

STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR BRIEFING OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT (CIVIL L.R. 6-1)

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Daniel Call and Defendant Wells Fargo & Company, by and through the undersigned attorneys, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 3

Whereas Plaintiff filed his complaint on October 25, 2011;

Whereas Defendant agreed to waive service of summons on October 26, 2011, thereby extending Defendant's response date to December 27, 2011; 6 7 trustee, Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., without prejudice, on November 17, 2011; 8

10 before January 10, 2012, and Defendant to file its reply on or before January 17, 2012; 11

13 briefing commitments in counsel's other matters; 14

Whereas Plaintiff and Defendant stipulated to the dismissal of Plaintiff's claims against the

Whereas Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on December 27, 2011;

Whereas Local Rule 7-3 requires Plaintiff to file his opposition to the motion to dismiss on or

Whereas the hearing has been set for March 1, 2012;

Whereas the parties request to extend the briefing schedule because of the New Year holiday and

Whereas the proposed briefing schedule ensures that the Court will receive all briefing on

Defendant's motion to dismiss more than two weeks prior to the scheduled hearing date; and 16

Whereas this agreement does not affect any of the dates set by the Court's October 25, 2011

Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines;

19 the parties, subject to the Court's approval, that: 20

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and through the undersigned attorneys for

1. Plaintiff must file his opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss on or before January

2. Defendant must file its reply to Plaintiff's response on or before February 13, 2012.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: January 4, 2012 GIRARD GIBBS LLP 2 3 By: ____/s/ Daniel C. Girard____________ Daniel C. Girard Amanda M. Steiner 5 601 California Street, Suite 1400 6 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 981-4800 7 Facsimile: (415) 981-4846 8 Attorneys for Individual and Representative 9 Plaintiff Daniel Call DATED: January 4, 2012 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 11 12 By: _____/s/ Bruce A. Ericson__________ 13 Bruce A. Ericson 14 Jeffrey Jacobi 50 Fremont Street 15 San Francisco, CA 94105 16 Telephone: (415) 983-1560 Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 17 18 Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo & Company

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3 was filed on the Court's CM/ECF system, and was thereby made available to counsel of record. 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 4, 2012, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document

Executed this 4th day of January, 2012 at San Francisco, California.

/s/ Daniel C. Girard

20120105

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.