UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 5, 2012
KEVIN E. FIELDS,
P. ROBERTS, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT NEUBARTH SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION FOR PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AGAINST HIM THIRTY DAY DEADLINE
I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Kevin E. Fields ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se
in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Plaintiff filed this action on April 10, 2006. (Doc. 1.) This action
now proceeds with the Fifth Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff on
June 24, 2010, against defendant P. Roberts for retaliation against
Plaintiff from February 28, 2006 to March 15, 2006, and against
defendant Jeff Neubarth for deliberate indifference.*fn1
On May 28, 2011, the Court issued an order directing the Marshal to serve process upon Defendants Roberts and Neubarth. (Doc. 59.) On October 3, 2011, the Court received a USM-285 form from the Marshal indicating that personal service was effected upon Defendant Neubarth on September 23, 2011, giving Defendant Neubarth twenty-one days in which to file an answer or motion under Rule 12 in response to Plaintiff's complaint. More than three months have passed, and Defendant Neubarth has not filed an answer, a motion under Rule 12, or any other response to Plaintiff's complaint. (See Court Docket.) Plaintiff has not filed a motion under Rule 55. Id.
II. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause why Defendant Neubarth should not be dismissed from this action for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute against him.
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file a written response to the Court, showing cause why Defendant Dr. Jeff Neubarth should not be dismissed from this action for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute against him; and
2. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order shall result a recommendation that this action be dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.