Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re Tft-Lcd (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation v. Au Optronics Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


January 6, 2012

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
NOKIA CORPORATION AND NOKIA INC.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Y. Illston United States District Judge

Randall Allen (State Bar No. 264067) 2 ALSTON BIRD LLP Two Palo Alto Square 3 3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400 Palo Alto, California 94306 4 Telephone: 650-838-2000 Facsimile: 650-838-2001 5 Email: randall.allen@alston.com 6 Peter Kontio (peter.kontio@alston.com) Valarie C. Williams (valarie.williams@alston.com) 7 B. Parker Miller (parker.miller@alston.com) Joann E. Johnston (joann.johnston@alston.com) 8 Lisa K. Bojko (lisa.bojko@alston.com) Donald M. Houser (donald.houser@alston.com) 9 ALSTON BIRD LLP 1201 West Peachtree Street 10 Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Telephone: 404-881-7000 11 Facsimile: 404-881-7777 12 Richard W. Stimson (rick.stimson@alston.com) ALSTON BIRD LLP 13 Chase Tower, Suite 3601 2200 Ross Avenue 14 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: 214-922-3400 15 Facsimile: 214-922-3899 16 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.

This Document Relates to: Case No. 3:09-CV-5609

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER

Plaintiff Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc. ("Nokia"), and Defendants Seiko Epson Corporation; Epson Imaging Devices Corporation; and Epson Electronics America, Inc. 3 ("Epson"), by their respective attorneys and under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil 4 Procedure, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of the present action with prejudice and state as follows:

1. Nokia and Epson seek the dismissal of this action with prejudice.

2. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of Nokia against any other defendant or co-conspirator in this litigation.

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court issue an Agreed Order of Dismissal.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION NOKIA CORPORATION and NOKIA INC., Plaintiffs, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION et al. Defendants.

CASE NO: 3:09-CV-5609 MDL FILE NO: 3:07-MD-1827-SI This Document Relates to: All Cases

PROPOSED ORDER 22

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows:

1. Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.'s action is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendants Seiko Epson Corporation; Epson Imaging Devices Corporation; and Epson Electronics America, Inc. 2 pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2). 3

2. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120106

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.