Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Au Optronics Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)


January 6, 2012

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Susan Illston Judge

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 4492 KENT M. ROGER, State Bar No. 95987 HERMAN J. HOYING, State Bar No. 257495 S. JESSICA OURK, State Bar No. 275658 One Market, Spear Street Tower O Fax: 415.442.1001 N kroger@morganlewis.com hhoying@morganlewis.com I jourk@morganlewis.com Tel: 415.442.1000 San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 Attorneys for Defendants R F HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC. DISTRICT

IT IS SO ORDERED

This Document Relates to: Individual Case No. 3:11-cv-00058-SI 15

Honorable Susan Illston

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL 17 LOCAL RULE 6-1(a) FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COSTCO'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff and Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. (collectively, the "Hitachi Defendants"), through the undersigned counsel, 3 hereby agree and enter into the following Stipulation to extend the deadline for the Hitachi 4 Defendants to answer Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint and Jury Demand ("Second 5 Amended Complaint"). 6 7

WHEREAS plaintiff Costco filed its Second Amended Complaint on December 23, 2011; and 9

WHEREAS the Hitachi Defendants need additional time to answer the Second Amended Complaint due to the recent holidays. 11

THEREFORE, Plaintiff and the Hitachi Defendants hereby agree and stipulate, pursuant to Rule 6-1(a) of the Civil Local Rules: 13 14

1. The Hitachi Defendants' deadline to answer the Second Amended Complaint shall be January 13, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

FILER'S ATTESTATION

I, Kent M. Roger, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file 10 this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that David J. Burman concurs in this filing.

/s/ Kent M. Roger Kent M. Roger Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

20120106

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.