Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jackie L. High, Individually and On Behalf Others Similarly Situated v. the Choice Manufacturing Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 10, 2012

JACKIE L. HIGH, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE CHOICE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., MEPCO FINANCE
CORPORATION, AND DOES 3 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Edward M. Chen United States

CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

REGARDING AMENDING COMPLAINT of All AND EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OT HERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

violation of California Business & Professions Code Sections 17200 and 17500, et seq.; Breach 3 of Contract and the Covenant of Good Faith & Fair Dealing; and breach of Express Warranty 4 against The Choice Manufacturing Company, Inc. ("Choice Manufacturing") and MEPCO Finance Corporation ("MEPCO"), captioned High v. The Choice Manufacturing Company, Inc., 6 et al.,Case No. CV-11-05478-EMC; 7 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a); 9

WHEREAS, on November 10, 2011, plaintiff Jackie L. High filed a complaint for WHEREAS on December 15, 2011, plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint ("AC")

WHEREAS defendant MEPCO has until January 11, 2012 and defendant Choice Manufacturing has until January 17, 2012 to answer or otherwise respond to the AC; 11 the Consumer Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA") against defendant Choice Manufacturing; 13 requirement in Cal. Civ. Code §1782(a)(2); 15 violation of the CLRA against Choice Manufacturing and allowing defendants additional time in 17 which to answer or respond to the such amended pleading; 18 parties, that 20

WHEREAS plaintiff wishes to further amend the AC to include a claim for violation of

WHEREAS plaintiff could not have included this claim in the AC because of the notice

WHEREAS defendants are amenable to plaintiff amending her AC to include a claim for

IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, by and between undersigned counsel for the (1) Plaintiff will file and serve her First Amended Complaint ("FAC") by January 11, 2012;

(2) Defendants Choice Manufacturing and MEPCO will have until February 17, 2012 to answer or otherwise respond to the FAC.

DATED: January 10, 2012 THE MEHDI FIRM 25 26 27 28 /s/ AZRA Z. MEHDI One Market Spear Tower, Suite 3600 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415/293-8039 Fax: 415/293-8001 Azram@themehdifirm.com Counsel for Plaintiff Jackie L. High

DATED: January 10, 2012 DOWNEY BRAND 7

/s/ JAMIE DREHER 621 Capital Mall, 18 Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916/444-1000 Fax: 916/444-2100 jdreher@downeybrand.com Counsel for Defendant MEPCO Finance Corporation

DATED: January 10, 2012 COOLEY LLP 15

/s/

MAZDA K. ANTIA 4401 Eastgate Mall San Diego, CA 92121 Telephone: 858/550-6000 Fax: 858/550-6420 mantia@cooley.com Counsel for Defendant The Choice Manufacturing Company, Inc.

Pursuant to General Order No. 45 Section X(B), all signatories concur in filing this stipulation. 22 23

By: /s/

AZRA Z. MEHDI

DATED: 1/11/12

ORDERED IT IS SO DISTRICT JUDGE

Submitted by: N

Edward M. Chen R

THE MEHDI FIRM Judge O AZRA Z. MEHDI (220406) R I

H A ___________/s/____________ E

AZRA Z. MEHDI N DI C

One Market

Spear Tower, Suite 3600 13

San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415/293-8093 14 Fax: 415/293-8001 Azram@themehdifirm.com 15 Counsel for Plaintiff 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

20120110

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.