Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Real Property Located At 3110 Morgan Hill Road

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 10, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3110 MORGAN HILL ROAD, HAYFORK, CALIFORNIA, TRINITY COUNTY, APN: 017-430-25,INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, DEFENDANT.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916)554-2723 Attorneys for the United States

STAY NO LONGER REQUIRED OF FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AND ORDER [PROPOSED]

The United States of America and claimant Jaime R. Serrano (hereafter "claimant") hereby advise the Court that a stay is no longer pertinent in this matter. As described more fully in the Orders Staying the Case entered on July 12, 2011 (Doc. 31) and November 16, 2011 (Doc. 34), this civil forfeiture case has been stayed pending the resolution of the related criminal charges filed against the claimant in Trinity County Superior Court.

The parties now submit that the criminal case filed against the claimant in the Trinity County Superior Court, i.e., the basis for the stay in the above-entitled case, has reached its conclusion. Per the Court's November 16, 2011 Order granting a further stay in the case, "the parties will advise the court of the status of the criminal case and will advise the court whether a further stay is necessary [within sixty days]." Accordingly, the stay is longer pertinent and the obligation to file a Joint Status Report is now active.

The parties submit:

1. The grounds forming the basis for the previous stay are no longer present and that a stay is no longer pertinent; and

2. The parties will file, fourteen days prior to the pretrial scheduling conference, a joint status report addressing the matters set forth in the July 9, 2010, Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference.

ORDER

For the reasons set forth above, the grounds forming the basis for the previous stay are no longer present and that a stay is no longer pertinent. On or before January 23, 2012, the parties will file a joint status report addressing the matters set forth in the July 9, 2010, Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference. The Scheduling Conference now set for February 6, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. shall remain scheduled as previously ordered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120110

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.