The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable James V. Selna
Present: The Honorable James V. Selna
Karla J. Tunis Not Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL
FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION and VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than January 30, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecutio. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date:
Proof of service of summons and complaint as to defendants
Absent a showing of good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served upon all defendants within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) The Court may dismiss the action prior to the expiration of such time, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not diligently prosecuted the action.
It is the plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time under Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court. Local Rule 7-1.
The Court hereby VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for Monday, January 14, 2013 pending the outcome of this Order to Show Cause.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw ...