Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Zep Solar, Inc., A California Corporation v. Westinghouse Solar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 11, 2012

ZEP SOLAR, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION,
PLAINTIFF, SNE
v.
WESTINGHOUSE SOLAR, INC., TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
(FORMERLY KNOWN A AKEENA SOLAR, INC.), A DELAWARE CORPORATION, ANDALAY SOLAR, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; LIGHTWAY GREEN NEW ENERGY COMPANY, LTD., A HEBEI COMPLAINT FILED: PROVINCE, CHINA CORPORATION; BRIGHTWAY GLOBAL, LLC, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION; MORRISON
SUPPLY COMPANY, LLC, A TEXAS CORPORATION; SKY SOLAR
SOLUTIONS, LLC, A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION; ALTERNATIVE POWER & ELECTRIC, A CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Maria-Elena James,

ES DIST T RI A CT J. Rick Tache (#195100) O D U ` S T C rtache@swlaw.com E R T Deborah S. Mallgrave (#198603) GRANTED T N I 3 dmallgrave@swlaw.com U A I 4 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. N 600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400 N James Judge Maria-Elena Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7689 O O Telephone: 714-427-7000 T 6 H L Facsimile: E C 714-427-7799 R Attorneys for Defendants Westinghouse Solar, Inc. and Andalay Solar, Inc. 9 10

Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400 Costa Mesa, California 92626-7689

Stipulation re Extension of Time

December 20, 2011

Ctrm. B & W ll L.L.P. LAW OFFICES (714) 427-7000

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff Zep Solar, Inc. and Defendants Westinghouse Solar, Inc. and Andalay Solar, Inc. (collectively "Defendants"), by 3 and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants 4 shall have a fourteen-day extension of time, until January 25, 2012, to respond to 5 the complaint filed by Plaintiff. By this stipulation, Defendants further stipulate 6 and agree that they will not challenge the adequacy of service or that jurisdiction 7 and venue are proper as to them in the Northern District of California. The parties 8 have not previously agreed to any extensions of time for Defendants to respond to 9 the complaint filed by Plaintiff. 10

In accordance with Northern District of California General Order No. 45, Section X, the filer of this document hereby attests that the concurrence to the filing 12 of this document has been obtained from the other signatory hereto. mer 13 il

20120111

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.