Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Karen Hanover Social

January 11, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
KAREN HANOVER SOCIAL
KAREN ELAINE HANOVER



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Josephine Staton Tucker U. S. District Judge

Security No. 8 5 7 3 (Last 4 digits)

JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER

MONTH DAY YEAR

In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. JAN 09 2012

John Early, Rtnd.

(Name of Counsel)

GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.

NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY

There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: False Impersonation of a Federal Officer in violation of 18 USC § 912 as charged in Count 3 of the 3-Count Second Superseding Indictment.

The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of: Six (6) months on Count 3 of the 3-Count Second Superseding Indictment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which is due immediately. Any unpaid balance shall be due during the period of imprisonment, at the rate of not less than $25 per quarter, and pursuant to the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall pay to the United States a total fine of $5,000, which shall bear interest as provided by law. The fine shall be paid in full immediately.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of one (1) year under the following terms and conditions:

The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;

During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and fine in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;

The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant;

The defendant shall apply all monies received from income tax refunds, lottery winnings, inheritance, judgments and any anticipated or unexpected financial gains to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation;

The defendant shall participate in mental health treatment, which may include evaluation and counseling, until discharged from the treatment by the treatment provider, with the approval of the Probation Officer; As directed by the Probation Officer, the defendant shall pay all or part of the costs of treating the defendant's psychiatric disorder to the aftercare contractor during the period of community supervision, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3672. The defendant shall provide payment and proof of payment as directed by the Probation Officer;

The defendant shall obtain and maintain full-time conventional employment. The defendant shall submit all employment offers which the defendant intends to accept to the Probation Officer for prior approval so the Probation Officer can verify the legitimacy of the employment. The defendant shall also keep the Probation Officer apprised of the defendant's work schedule;

The defendant shall not be employed in any capacity wherein she conducts seminars and/or solicits investment opportunities; and

The defendant shall not be self-employed, or employed by a business owned by a family member or close personal friend, without prior approval of the Probation Officer. If the defendant is self-employed, or employed by a business owned by a family member or close personal friend, the defendant shall allow the Probation Officer to perform a reasonable number of random audits of business records with the assistance of an auditor or accountant, at the expense of the defendant.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.