Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Christopher Kramer, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Administrative Autobytel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION


January 12, 2012

CHRISTOPHER KRAMER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ADMINISTRATIVE AUTOBYTEL, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND B2MOBILE, LLC, A
CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND LEADCLICK MEDIA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Claudia A. Wilken

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY AND DEPOSE THIRD PARTIES

to Reopen Discovery and Depose Third Parties. The Court, having reviewed the papers filed in 17 support of and in opposition to the motion, and good cause appearing therein, Plaintiff's Motion 18 is hereby GRANTED. 19

Plaintiff's request to depose Steven Cope, an alleged Class Member, regarding his

This matter came before the Court on Plaintiff's Administrative Motion For Permission 20 objections filed in this action on January 5, 2011 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's request to depose the 21 custodian of records for the Law Offices of Darrell Palmer, counsel for objector, is GRANTED. 22

Objector Steven Cope and the custodian of records for the Law Offices of Darrell Palmer shall 23 each appear for a deposition on or before January 23, 2012. Objector Steven Cope and the 24 custodian of records for the Law Offices of Darrell Palmer shall also produce the documents 25 requested in Plaintiff's Attachment A, attached to his subpoenas two days prior to their 26 respective depositions. To the extent Steven Cope or the custodian of records for the Law 27 28

Offices of Darrell Palmer withhold any documents on grounds of privilege, a detailed privilege 2 log shall also be produced (at the same time as the documents referenced in the prior sentence), 3 providing the information required by Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 26(b)(5) and requested by Plaintiff in 4 the Attachment A attached to their subpoenas. 5 6

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED this _______ day of __________, 2012

HONORABLE CLAUDIA A. WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20120112

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.