IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 17, 2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
LORETTA LEIGH CANHAM,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell
DANIEL BRODERICK, Bar # 89424 Federal Defender DENNIS S. WAKS, Bar #142581 Supervising Assistant Federal Defender 801 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 498-5700 Attorney for Defendant LORETTA LEIGH CANHAM
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] Date: March 2, 2012 Time: 9:00 a.m.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, MICHAEL M. BECKWITH, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and DENNIS S. WAKS, Supervising Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for defendant, LORETTA LEIGH CANHAM, that the current Status Conference date of January 20, 2012 be vacated and reset for March 2, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.
Defense counsel needs additional time to prepare, to review the discovery, and to interview witnesses.
It is further stipulated and agreed to between the parties that the time from the date of the signing of this order to and including March 2, 2012 should be excluded within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. All parties stipulate and agree that this is an appropriate exclusion of time within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code, §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv)(Local Code T4).
ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act through March 2, 2012.
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.