UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
January 23, 2012
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
The Court has reviewed the parties' briefs in connection with their cross-motions for 11 summary judgment. The last brief submitted to the Court was "Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's 12 Opposition," which was filed on January 5, 2012. Dkt. No. 28. It shows that the parties disagree about which issues are now moot.
Plaintiff also raises several new arguments in its brief. The Court supplemental brief, no longer than five pages, by February 6, 2012. Along with their supplemental finds that it will be helpful for the parties to file supplemental brief, no longer than five pages, by January 30, 2012. Plaintiff shall respond with a supplemental briefs to clarify which issues are still in dispute as well as respond to newly-raised arguments. Accordingly, Defendant shall file a briefs, both parties shall file revised proposed orders that specifically outline the relief they seek from 19 the Court. The Court encourages the parties to continue to meet and confer in good faith in an attempt to narrow the issues that need to be decided. If any resolutions are reached after the 21 supplemental briefs are filed, the parties shall notify the Court. 22 The hearing on this matter, recently moved to February 9, 2012, is VACATED. After the 23 Court receives security clearance, it will review the parties' filings and the declaration at issue. If the 24 Court finds that a hearing is necessary, it will schedule one at that time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.