Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jim L. Meadors v. Michael J. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 23, 2012

JIM L. MEADORS.,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER ON APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Doc. 4)

On January 20, 2012, Plaintiff Jim L. Meadors ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docs. 1, 4.) The Court determined that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis failed to provide a complete response to Question 3e; specifically, neither box was checked off as required. Further, Question 6 requested that Plaintiff "[l]ist the persons who are dependent on you for support, state your relationship to each person and indicate how much you contribute to their support." Plaintiff's response of "S. M. (4)" does not answer this question and the response is unclear. As such, the Court cannot make a final determination as to Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff file a revised application to proceed in forma pauperis within ten (10) days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120123

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.