Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

David E. Edwards v. Csp Solano

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 24, 2012

DAVID E. EDWARDS,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
CSP SOLANO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Craig M. Kellison United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner now proceeding with counsel, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to the written consent of all parties, this case is before the undersigned as the presiding judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Pursuant to the current schedule in this case, the time for any dispositive motions has passed. The court has resolved the motions for summary judgment, the parties attended an unsuccessful settlement conference, and this case should now be ready for trial. Status reports were filed by the parties last year, prior to the summary judgment motions and settlement conference. As significant time has passed, the court now requires an update. The parties shall therefore submit to the court a report on the status of this case. As plaintiff is now represented by counsel, the parties shall meet and confer prior to filing their report.*fn1 The report must address the following:

1. Whether this matter is ready for trial and, if not, why not;

2. Whether a pretrial motion is contemplated and, if so, the type of motion and the time needed to file the motion and complete the time schedule set forth in Local Rule 230;

3. A narrative statement of the facts that will be offered by oral or documentary evidence at trial;

4. A list of all exhibits to be offered into evidence at the trial of the case;

5. A list of the names and addresses of all witnesses the party intends to call;

6. A summary of the anticipated testimony of any incarcerated witnesses;

7. Proposed dates for trial, including the time estimated for trial;

8. Whether either party still requests trial by jury;

9. If any defendants remain unserved, the parties shall address whether such defendants should be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m);

10. Whether a status conference is necessary prior to setting this matter for trial; and

11. Any other matter, not covered above, which the party desires to call to the attention of the court.

Following the receipt of the status reports, unless it is determined that a status conference is necessary, the court will issue a final scheduling order setting this matter for a pre-trial hearing and trial. The parties will thereafter be required to file pre-trial statements, and the court will address the issue of any incarcerated witnesses.

The parties are warned that failure to file a status report which addresses the issues set forth above may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including dismissal of the action or preclusion of issues or witnesses. See Local Rule 110.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a status report, either jointly or separately, within 30 days.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.