Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mophie Inc v. Ronald Reeves et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 25, 2012

MOPHIE INC
v.
RONALD REEVES ET AL

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Kane Tien N/A

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

N/A N/A

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

The Court, having received the plaintiff's response re OSC on January 23, 2012 [10], hereby VACATES the Order to Show Cause issued on January 9, 2012 [9].

Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than February 22, 2012 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution.

As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently.

* Proof of service of summons and complaint (applicable for defendant(s) who have not been served);

* In cases removed from State Court, responsive pleadings filed by all defendants

* Request for entry of default by plaintiff(s) (applicable where defendants have been served but not answered);

* Motion for default judgment.

Initials of Preparer KTI

20120125

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.