Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lauren Bachtell-Willarsmarien, An Individual and Successor-In-Interest v. City of Gardena A California Public Entity; Gardena Police Department

January 26, 2012

LAUREN BACHTELL-WILLARSMARIEN, AN INDIVIDUAL AND SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST FOR MITCHELL MARIEN; AND M.V.M., A MINOR BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN, LAUREN BACHTELLWILLARS-MARIEN AND SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST FOR MITCHELL MARIEN, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY OF GARDENA A CALIFORNIA PUBLIC ENTITY; GARDENA POLICE DEPARTMENT, A CALIFORNIA PUBLIC ENTITY; AND EDGAR VARGAS, AN INDIVIDUAL, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: A. Howard Matz

ORDER APPROVING MINOR COMPROMISE OF A DISPUTED CLAIM

Hearing Information:

Date: January 9, 2012 Time: 10:00 a.m.

Ctrm: 14

Plaintiff/Petitioner LAUREN BACHTELL-WILLARS (MARIEN) brought a Petition to Approve Minor Compromise of a Disputed Claim, which was heard on January 9, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 14 of the above-referenced Court, the Honorable A. Howard Matz presiding. Aree Shahparnia appeared on behalf of Plaintiff/Petitioner. Shareef S. Farag appeared on behalf of the Defendants.

ORDER

This is a civil rights action accompanied by state law tort claims against the City of Gardena, Gardena Police Department, and Edgar Vargas, an individual. Defendant Edgar Vargas was at all times herein and is an officer employed by the Gardena Police Department. The Complaint seeks damages to redress the violation of Mitchell Marien's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizure, excessive force and his Fourteenth Amendment rights not to be deprived of his life without due process and equal protection under the laws. The claims arise out of an officer-involved shooting involving Mitchell Marien and Edgar Vargas on or about May 28, 2009. Mitchell Marien was shot and killed during that incident.

Plaintiff Lauren Bachtell-Willars (Marien) is the widow of the deceased Mitchell Marien. M.V.M. is the daughter and only child of the deceased Mitchell Marien. Lauren Bachtell-Willars (Marien) brings this action on behalf of herself and on behalf of her daughter, M.V.M as M.V.M's guardian. Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of Mitchell Marien as his heirs and successors-in-interest.

The parties now wish to settle this matter and have reached a settlement agreement. The principle terms of the settlement are as follows:

1. The Plaintiffs hereby agree to release EDGAR VARGAS and any of his agents, servants employees, officers, directors, subsidiaries, successors, and their attorneys, including Manning & Kass, Ellrod, Ramirez, Trester, LLP and any of their attorneys, agents, servants, employees, officers, directors, subsidiaries, and successors from the Lawsuit and agree that this settlement is with the CITY OF GARDENA and the GARDENA POLICE DEPARTMENT only.

2. The Plaintiffs hereby agree to accept receipt from the Releasors the sum of one hundred thousand dollars [$100,000.00] ("settlement payment") as good and valid consideration to settle any and all claims arising from or in any way related to the Incident, the Lawsuit, and the handling and settlement of the Lawsuit by or on behalf of the Defendants, and any and all of the Plaintiffs' claims therein. The Plaintiffs accept this sum to cover any and all of Plaintiffs' purported actual damages, fees, costs and expenses--whether past, present, or future--which arise either directly or indirectly out of any Defendants' involvement in any act or omission which is in any way related to the Incident or the Lawsuit.

The Court having read and considered all papers filed in support of and in opposition to, the Court having heard and considered the proposed compromise, and determining that the compromise settlement and the proposed disposition of the proceeds for the claimant, M.V.M as being fair, reasonable, and in the best interest of the claimant, M.V.M., approves the compromise settlement and makes the following Order:

THE COURT FINDS that the settlement is reasonable and in the parties' best interests, including the minor, M.V.M.;

IT IS ORDERED that the Court approves the compromise settlement and the proposed disposition of the proceeds for the claimant, M.V.M as being fair, reasonable, and ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.