Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Troy Stratos

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 2, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
TROY STRATOS, DEFENDANT.

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT [18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)]

The parties appeared before the Court for a status hearing on January 31, 2012. David Weiner, Esq., specially appeared for Walter Urban, Esq., who is counsel of record for Defendant. Mr. Weiner represented to the Court that Mr. Urban is currently representing a different client in a trial in the Central District of California, and requested that the matter be continued to February 7, 2012, to allow for his preparation for this case. Additionally, upon advisement by the Court of his rights under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, Defendant Troy Stratos acknowledged his rights and stipulated to the exclusion of time until February 7, 2012 with respect to a trial within 70 days of his indictment.

Furthermore, during the detention hearing before the Honorable Edmund F. Brennan, the United States represented to the Court that Defendant has been provided in discovery approximately 800 pages of documents and seven DVDs containing audio recordings, and that Defendant has been informed there are approximately 42 boxes of additional documents available for his review. The Court, Magistrate Judge Brennan presiding, found that the case was complex under Local Code T2, which corresponds to the provisions under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii), and that defense counsel needed time to prepare for his client's defense under Local Code T4, which corresponds to the provisions under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that trial delay and exclusion of time is necessary to provide defense counsel reasonable time to prepare his client's defense taking into account due diligence. The Court further finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, the time period from January 31, 2012, to February 7, 2012, is EXCLUDED under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), and Local Code T4, due to the need to provide defense counsel with the reasonable time to prepare.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120202

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.