Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Percy Stockton v. C/O Ortiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 2, 2012

PERCY STOCKTON,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
C/O ORTIZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN OPPOSITION OR A STATEMENT OF NON OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 30) TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Percy Stockton, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 23, 2009. On January 12, 2012, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Although Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated, Local Rule 230(l) shall continue to apply to this action.

Accordingly, Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order, and Plaintiff is warned that if he fails to file a response to the motion in compliance with this order, this action will be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120202

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.