Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Percy Stockton v. C/O Ortiz

February 2, 2012

PERCY STOCKTON,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
C/O ORTIZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN OPPOSITION OR A STATEMENT OF NON OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 30) TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Percy Stockton, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 23, 2009. On January 12, 2012, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Although Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated, Local Rule 230(l) shall continue to apply to this action.

Accordingly, Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order, and Plaintiff is warned that if he fails to file a response to the motion in compliance with this order, this action will be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120202

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.