Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Evodio Moreno

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 2, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
EVODIO MORENO,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

REVISED STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING; ORDER Date March 5, 2012 Time: 10:00 a.m.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the status conference hearing in the above captioned matter now set for February 6, 2012, may be continued to March 5, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.

This continuance is requested by counsel for the defendant because the parties anticipate a resolution of the matter and need additional time for plea negotiations. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the court. Assistant United States Attorney Mark McKeon has no objection to this request.

The parties agree that time shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) in that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, including, but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation and continuing plea negotiation purposes.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DATED: Feberuary 2, 2012 /s/ Mark McKeon MARK McKEON Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender DATED: February 2, 2012 /s/ Marc Days MARC DAYS Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant EVODIO MORENO

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the continuance requested is granted for good cause. The Court finds that the interest of justice outweighs the interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial, and time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20120202

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.