Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Cigigredo Galeana-Reyes

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 2, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CIGIGREDO GALEANA-REYES,
DEFENDANT.

AMENDED ORDER AFTER HEARING

This matter came on calendar for a status conference hearing on January 31, 2012, in the courtroom of the Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton, Senior Judge. Assistant United States Attorney Michele Beckwith appeared on behalf of the United States of America. Assistant Federal Defender Caro Marks appeared on behalf of Defendant Cigifredo Galeana-Reyes, who was present before the court.

A representative from United States Probation informed the court that due to Probation's backlog of cases, it would need an additional six weeks time to prepare and disseminate the defendant's "Alien Pre-Plea Presentence Report", which report is necessary for the parties to resolve the case. Responding that the defendant was incarcerated and would continue to be incarcerated during the requested six-week continuance, the court denied this request. The court directed U.S. Probation to furnish an explanation for its backlog. U.S. Probation Officer Horner agreed to prepare and disseminate the report within the upcoming week. The court set the matter for further status conference one week hence, on February 7, 2012, at 9:15 am.

The parties agreed on the need for additional time to allow time for defense and Probation's preparation. The parties need time to receive and review the Alien Pre-Plea PSR, to draft a plea agreement, and to review both with the defendant.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter be set for further status conference on February 7, 2012 at 9:15 am..

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), and Local Code T4, the period from January 31, 2012, up to and including February 7, 2012, is excluded from the time computations required by the Speedy Trial Act due to counsel preparation.

THE COURT FINDS that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interest of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial.

20120202

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.