UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
February 6, 2012
KIMBERLY YORDY, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
PLEAD PLIMUS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AND GREAT HILL PARTNERS, LLC, A MASSACHUSETTS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thelton E. Henderson Judge
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS PLIMUS, INC. AND GREAT HILL PARTNERS, LLC TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
WHEREAS, on January 13, 2012, Plaintiff Kimberly Yordy filed a Complaint against Defendants Plimus, Inc. ("Plimus") and Great Hill Partners, LLC ("Great Hill). 26
WHEREAS, Defendant Great Hill was served with the Complaint on January 17, 2012.
WHEREAS, Defendant Plimus was served with the Complaint on January 20, 2012.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(A)(i), Defendant Great Hill must answer or otherwise plead by February 7, 2012. 3
WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(A)(i), Defendant Plimus 4 must answer or otherwise plead by February 10, 2012. 5
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties through their counsel, that 6 pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the time for the Defendants Plimus and Great Hill to answer, move, or 7 otherwise respond to the Complaint ("Response Date") shall be extended to and including March 2, 8 2012. 9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: February 2, 2012 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 13 /s/ Nickolas A. Kacprowski Nickolas A. Kacprowski Jeffrey L. Willian, P.C. (pro hac vice pending) Jordan M. Heinz (pro hac vice pending) Sylvia Nichole Winston (pro hac vice pending) Attorneys for Defendants Plimus, Inc. and Great Hill Partners, LLC DATED: February 2, 2012 EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLP 20 /s/ Sean Patrick Reis Sean Patrick Reis Attorneys for Plaintiff
IT IS SO ORDERED
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.