Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Santa Monica Baykeeper, et al. v. City of Malibu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 6, 2012

SANTA MONICA BAYKEEPER, ET AL.
v.
CITY OF MALIBU

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable A. Howard Matz, U.S. District Judge

O

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable A. HOWARD MATZ, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Stephen Montes Not Reported

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys NOT Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys NOT Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS (No Proceedings Held)

The Court orders the parties to file a joint report stating the most efficient order in which the Court should decide the 26 pending motions and cross motions in limine. In doing so, they must take into account whether the resolution of any given motion will moot the need to decide other motions. They should also take into account whether these motions may or should be placed into separate groups, so that the Court can consider motions raising comparable issues or involving overlapping facts in their entirety before the Court turns to a different group. In addition, they should provide any other information that will aid the Court in efficiently deciding these motions. The joint report should be filed no later than 7 days from the date of this order. The Court is beset with a packed case load and will turn to the motions when it can.

Initials of Preparer SMO

20120206

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.