Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Lonnell Mccarter

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 6, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
LONNELL MCCARTER,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender JEFFREY L. STANIELS, Bar #91413 Assistant Federal Defender 801 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 498-5700 Attorney for Defendant LONNELL McCARTER

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE

Date: February 6, 2012 Time: 9:30 a.m.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Michelle Prince, counsel for Plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Jeffrey Staniels, counsel for defendant LONNELL McCARTER, that the status conference scheduled for February 6, 2012, be vacated and the matter continued until March 19, 2012 at 9:30 a.m., for further status conference at the request of the defense.

The reason for the continuance is to allow for further review of discovery, submission of follow-up discovery requests, and continuation of investigation now in progress.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the interests of justice served by the granting of this continuance outweigh the interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial and that time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be excluded between February 6, 2012, and March 19, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv), Local Code T-4 (time to prepare).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The above stipulation of the parties is accepted. The status conference set for February 6, 2012, is VACATED. This case is ordered to be re-calendared on March 19, 2012 at 9:30 a.m., for status conference.

The court finds, based on the reasons stated above, that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By the Court,

20120206

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.