UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
February 7, 2012
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Edward J. Davila United States District Judge
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR JOINDER (Re: Docket No. 3)
Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Joinder pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(1). For the reasons discussed below, the motion is DENIED. 18
On November 28, 2011, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action. Also on November 28, 2011, Plaintiff filed this Motion for Joinder.
On December 12, 2011, Defendant Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook") filed a motion to relate this case to a class action that is also before this court, Davis, et al. v. Facebook, Case No. 11-CV-23 04834 EJD. See Docket No. 7. On December 14, 2011 the court determined that this case was not 24 related to the class action. See Docket No. 8.
On January 11, 2012, the court determined that this case is related to the following cases:
11-CV-6367, 11-CV-5700, 11-CV-5701, 11-CV-5763, 11-CV-5764. See Docket No. 14. On January 26, 2012, the court determined that case number 11-CV-06445 is also related to these six 28 cases. See Docket No. 21.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(1), persons may join in one action as plaintiffs if: (a) they 3 assert any right to relief jointly, severally, or in the alternative with respect to or arising out of the 4 same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences; and (b) any question of law 5 or fact common to all plaintiffs will arise in the action. 6
The court is unable to determine from Plaintiff's motion what joinder Plaintiff seeks.
Plaintiff's motion states that Plaintiff "makes this request for joinder in this controversy, due to the 9 efficiency it would provide to this Court and the related claim within the class action already in 10 dispute against Facebook Inc." Docket No. 3. Plaintiff, however, has not identified any additional plaintiffs to join in this action. Thus, Plaintiff has not provided sufficient information to the court to demonstrate that the requirements of Rule 20(a)(1) are satisfied. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for joinder is DENIED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.