Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fletcher Carson v. Verismart Software

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division


February 13, 2012

FLETCHER CARSON,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
VERISMART SOFTWARE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Laurel Beeler United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER RESETTING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW

D 16 On August 1, 2011, pro se Plaintiff Fletcher Carson filed his original complaint. ECF No. 1 at

1. On January 7, 2012, Carson filed a motion for a restraining order and an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue against Defendants Verismart Software, Inc., Joe Dawson, 19 James Garvey, Carl Raff, Andy Thoren, and Phillip Thoren on Carson's copyright infringement claims. ECF No. 26 at 1. In the motion, Carson requested that the court hear the matter no later 21 than February 16, 2012, when some of the defendants had noticed a motion to dismiss. Id. at 3. The 22 court set a hearing for Carson's motion on this date. The court subsequently reset the hearing on the 23 defendants' motions to dismiss to March 15, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. ECF No. 66. Given the court's 24 view that it would be most efficient to hear all of the pending matters on the same date, the court 25 now resets Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction to March 15, 2012 at 11:00 a.m.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED. 27

20120213

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.