Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

William Crosby v. County of Mono; et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 14, 2012

WILLIAM CROSBY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COUNTY OF MONO; ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

On December 28, 2011, plaintiff William Crosby filed his first amended complaint (ECF No. 27), stating a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 with various attendant state law claims. On January 12, 2012, defendants Rick Moberly, Paul Robles, Town of Mammoth Lakes, Seth Clark, County of Mono (collectively, "defendants") moved to dismiss the complaint for failing to state a cause of action. (ECF Nos. 28-32.) Under Local Rule 230(c), plaintiff's opposition or statement of non-opposition was due on February 10, 2012. Plaintiff has failed to timely file either an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to dismiss. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause within seven (7) days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The February 24, 2012 hearing date is hereby vacated pending resolution of this order to show cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120214

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.