Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

William Crosby v. County of Mono; et al

February 14, 2012

WILLIAM CROSBY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COUNTY OF MONO; ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



ORDER

On December 28, 2011, plaintiff William Crosby filed his first amended complaint (ECF No. 27), stating a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 with various attendant state law claims. On January 12, 2012, defendants Rick Moberly, Paul Robles, Town of Mammoth Lakes, Seth Clark, County of Mono (collectively, "defendants") moved to dismiss the complaint for failing to state a cause of action. (ECF Nos. 28-32.) Under Local Rule 230(c), plaintiff's opposition or statement of non-opposition was due on February 10, 2012. Plaintiff has failed to timely file either an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to dismiss. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause within seven (7) days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The February 24, 2012 hearing date is hereby vacated pending resolution of this order to show cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120214

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.