IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 16, 2012
DWIGHT DAVID COLEMAN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
GMAC MORTGAGE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
By order filed January 20, 2012, plaintiffs were ordered to show cause, within fourteen days, why their action should not be dismissed because either removal was improper and there was no subject matter jurisdiction, or for failure to failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The fourteen day period has now expired, and plaintiffs have not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order.
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.