IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 16, 2012
JACQUELINE M. TAYLOR, PLAINTIFF,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER AFTER STATUS CONFERENCE
On February 16, 2012, the undersigned held yet another follow-up status conference addressing plaintiff's difficulty serving the named defendants with process.*fn1 Plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel, appeared and represented herself. None of the named defendants have appeared in this action because no defendant has yet been properly served with either the Complaint or First Amended Complaint and related process.
At the hearing, the court discussed plaintiff's continued difficulty with service and the fact that plaintiff has an obligation to complete service on a timely basis so that this case can move forward. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Moreover, although plaintiff is attempting to serve the defendants, she has not yet completed service of process despite the fact that this case has been pending for nearly one year. The court previously granted plaintiff leave to serve the defendants within 60 days from the issuance of an amended summons related to the First Amended Complaint. (See Order, Dec. 2, 2011, Dkt. No. 12.) The summons was issued on December 29, 2011 (Dkt. No. 14), and plaintiff's period for service thus expires on February 27, 2012. By this order, the court grants plaintiff a final extension in which to serve the defendants with the First Amended Complaint and related process.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall have until March 19, 2012, to complete service of the First Amended Complaint and related process on the named defendants.
2. On March 19, 2012, plaintiff shall file a status report advising the court about the progress of service. If plaintiff fails to timely file that status report, her case will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m) and 41(b), and this court's Local Rules 110 and 183(a).
3. If plaintiff fails to complete service as to any of the defendants by March 19, 2012, plaintiff's case will be dismissed without prejudice as to each unserved defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).
IT IS SO ORDERED.