Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Steven Sinacori v. Hewlett-Packard Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 22, 2012

STEVEN SINACORI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION. DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Sinacori ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") stipulate 3 and agree to continue the Case Management Conference scheduled for February 4 29, 2012 until May 3, 2012, and jointly request that the Court approve this 5 extension pursuant to L.R. 6-2. 6 Case Management Conference for Wednesday, February 29, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. 8 before Judge Lucy Koh; 9 10 complaint (the "Amended Complaint") against HP; 11

HP will file a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint on March 2, 2012; 13 14 on HP's anticipated motion to dismiss for May 3, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.; 15 16 the parties, the parties have agreed subject to approval of this Court to continue the 17 Case Management Conference from February 29, 2012 to May 3, 2012 to coincide 18 with the parties scheduled appearance before the Court with regard to HP's motion 19 to dismiss; 20 21 file Case Management statements by April 26, 2012; 22 23 conduct the meet and confer conference required by Rule 26(f) of the Federal 24 Rules of Civil Procedure on or before February 24, 2012; 25 26 negatively impact any event or deadlines already affixed by the Court; 27 28 Through this Stipulated Request and [Proposed] Order, Plaintiff Steven

WHEREAS, on December 22, 2011, the Court entered an Order setting a

WHEREAS, on February 3, 2012, Plaintiff filed an amended class action

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Order entered by the Court on January 2, 2012,

WHEREAS, pursuant to that same Order, the Court has scheduled a hearing

WHEREAS, in the interest of efficiency and convenience for the Court and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the continuance, the parties further have agreed to

WHEREAS, despite the requested continuance,the parties have agreed to

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the extension of time will not

NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff and HP 2 stipulate to, and request the Court's approval of, a continuance of the February 29, 3 2012 Case Management Conference until May 3, 2012, with Case Management 4 Statements due on or before April 26, 2012. 5

Dated: February 14, 2012 KIESEL BOUCHER & LARSON LLP 6 7 By: /s/ Gina M. Tufaro Paul R. Kiesel, Esq. (SBN 119854) 8 kiesel@kbla.com 9 8648 Wilshire Boulevard Beverly Hills, CA 90211 10 Telephone: (310) 854-4444 11 Facsimile: (310) 854-0812 12 HORWITZ, HORWITZ & 13 PARADIS, Attorneys at Law 14 Paul O. Paradis, Esq. Gina M. Tufaro, Esq. 15 Mark A. Butler, Esq. 16 570 7th Avenue, 20th Floor 17 New York, NY 10018 Telephone: (212) 986.4500 18 Facsimile: (212) 986-4501 Attorneys for Plaintiff 19 20 21 22 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Dated: February 14, 2012 24 By: /s/ Kristofor T. Henning Kristofor T. Henning (Pro Hac Vice) 23 25 khenning@morganlewis.com 26 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 27 28 Telephone: (215) 963-5000 Facsimile: (215) 963-5001 Attorneys for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Co.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120222

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.