UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 22, 2012
SUZANNE D. JACKSON,
WILLIAM FISCHER, JON SABES, STEVEN SABES, DAVID GOLDSTEEN, MARVIN ROBERT J. STUMPF SIEGEL, BRIAN CAMPION, LONNIE BOOKBINDER, CHETAN NARSUDE,
MANI KOOLASURIYA, JOSHUA ROSEN, UPPER ORBIT, LLC, SPECIGEN, INC.,
PEER DREAMS INC., NOTEBOOKZ INC., ILEONARDO.COM INC., NEW MOON
LLC, MONVIA LLC, AND SAZANI BEACH HOTEL,
KAUFMAN LLC ALAN H. KAUFMAN 2 445 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 3 Telephone: 646-820-6550 Facsimile: 646-820-6568 4 Appearing Pro Hac Vice SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership 6 Including Professional Corporations ROBERT J. STUMPF, JR., Cal. Bar No. 72851 7 email@example.com Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor 8 San Francisco, California 94111-4109 Telephone: 415-434-9100 9 Facsimile: 415-434-3947 Attorneys for Plaintiff Suzanne D. Jackson
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO REPLY; DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT THEREOF
RESPOND TO MOTIONS
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, it is hereby stipulated by and between the parties, through their respective attorneys, that:
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Suzanne Jackson ("Jackson") filed and served her First Amended Complaint on December 5, 2011;
WHEREAS, Jackson and Defendants William Fischer, Upper Orbit LLC, Jon Sabes, Steven Sabes, Marvin Siegel, Mani Koolasuriya, Monvia LLC, Chetan Narsude and New Moon LLC ("Defendants") previously stipulated that Defendants' last day to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint would be January 13, 2012;
WHEREAS, Defendants requested an additional extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff agreed to extend Defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint to January 27, 2012;
WHEREAS, Defendants agreed that Plaintiff's opposition to the motions to dismiss would be due on or before February 24, 2012;
WHEREAS, Jackson requested an additional extension of time to oppose the motions to 17 dismiss, to March 16, 2012; 18
WHEREAS, Defendants agreed that Plaintiff's opposition to the motions to dismiss would 19 be due on or before March 16, 2012; 20
WHEREAS the parties further agreed that Defendants would have an extension of time to 21 file replies on their motions to dismiss, such that they would be due on or before April 9, 2012; 22
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT, subject to 23 the Court's approval, Plaintiff shall file and serve her opposition to Defendants' motions to 24 dismiss on or before March 16, 2012, and Defendants shall file and serve their reply papers on or 25 before April 9, 2012. 26 27
Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, Robert 14 J. Stumpf, Jr. hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Hon. Jeffrey S. White
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.