Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Issac Mejia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 22, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ISSAC MEJIA,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

DATE: March 26, 2012 TIME: 9:30 a.m.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through PAUL HEMESATH Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, ISSAC MEJIA by and through his counsel, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for Monday, February 27, 2012, be continued to Monday, March 26, 2012, at 9:30 a.m..

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for March 26, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

DATED: February 22, 2012 Respectfully submitted, DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender /s/ Matthew M. Scoble MATTHEW M. SCOBLE Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant ISSAC MEJIA DATED: February 22, 2012 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney /s/ Matthew M. Scoble for PAUL HEMESATH Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is continued to Monday, March 26, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., for further status conference. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A) &(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, the period from the date of this stipulation, February 22, 2012, up to and including March 26, 2012, is excluded from the time computations required by the Speedy Trial Act due to ongoing preparation of counsel, and that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

20120222

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.