The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Kronstadt, U. S. District Judge
Social Security No. 1 9 8 1
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this 02 23 2012
Neha A. Mehta, Deputy Federal Public Defender
X GUILTY, and the Court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of:
Theft of Mail pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1708 as charged in Count 1 of the Information.
The Court and counsel confer. Counsel present argument. Defendant addresses the Court. The Court places findings on the record and proceeds with sentencing. The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that:
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Cesar Luevano, is hereby committed on Count One of the Information to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of TIME SERVED.
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of THREE (3) YEARS under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant;
The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, not to exceed eight tests per month, as directed by the Probation Officer;
The defendant shall participate in an outpatient substance abuse treatment and counseling program that includes urinalysis, breath, and/or sweat patch testing, as directed by the Probation Officer. The defendant shall abstain from using illicit drugs and alcohol, and abusing prescription medications during the period of supervision;
During the course of supervision, the Probation Officer, shall devise a drug treatment plan for defendant, and shall take into consideration paragraph 6 of the October 24, 2011 recommendation letter when devising such a plan. The plan shall include counseling and testing to determine if the defendant has reverted to the use of drugs. Defendant's failure to comply with the recommended treatment plan will result in a violation of his supervised
The defendant shall participate in mental health treatment, which may include evaluation and counseling, until discharged from the treatment by the treatment provider, with the approval of the Probation Officer; and As directed by the Probation Officer, the defendant shall pay all or part of the costs of treating the defendant's substance abuse and mental health to the aftercare contractor during the period of community supervision, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3672. The defendant shall provide payment and proof of payment as directed by the Probation Officer.
The Court authorizes the Probation Office to disclose the Presentence Investigation Report to the substance abuse treatment provider to facilitate the defendant's treatment for narcotic addiction or drug dependency. Further redisclosure of the Presentence Investigation Report by the treatment provider is prohibited without the consent of the sentencing judge.
The Court authorizes the Probation Officer to disclose the Presentence Investigation Report, and/or any previous mental health evaluations or reports, to the treatment provider. The treatment provider may provide information (excluding the Presentence Investigation Report), to state or local social service agencies (such as the State of California, Department of Social Services), for the purpose of the client's rehabilitation.
The Court recommends that the Bureau of Prisons conduct a mental health evaluation of the defendant and provide all necessary
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which is due immediately. Any unpaid balance shall be due paid at ...