The opinion of the court was delivered by: Stephen V. Wilson, U. S. District Judge
Social Security No. 4 4 1 0
JUDGM ENT AND PROBATION/COM M ITM ENT ORDER
the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 02 13 2012
M ichael Belter (advisory)
GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO NOT GUILTY CONTENDERE
There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: M AKING THREATS THROUGH INTERSTATE COM M UNICATIONS in violation of 18 U.S.C. §875(c) as charged in Counts 1 & 2; and STALKING in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2261A(2)(A) as charged in Count 3 of the Indictment T /
The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of:
term consists of 3 years on each of Counts 1, 2, and 3 of the Indictment, to be served concurrently. This term is to be served to any term imposed under USDC/CDCA Docket No. 09-00362.
n release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of three years. This term consists of n each of Counts 1, 2 and 3 of the Indictment, all such terms to run concurrently under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment in accordance with this judgment's to such payment;
The defendant shall participate in mental health treatment, which may include evaluation and counseling, until discharged ent by the treatment provider, with the approval of the Probation Officer;
The defendant shall not contact, or attempt to contact, Victim Kim Stewart of the Boulder Police Department, including but her parents, siblings, other relatives, any spouse or significant other with whom Victim may share an intimate relationship now or during the pendency of any term of supervised release), and any children of Victim Kim Stewart, directly or indirectly including but not limited to in person, by mail, telephone, email, text message, or otherwise via the internet or other electronic ugh a third party;
The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $300, which is due immediately.
ursuant to Guideline Section 5E1.2(a), all fines are waived as the Court finds that the defendant has established that he is unable to likely to become able to pay any fine.
ant is advised of his rights on appeal.
Court finds that the defendant is in violation of the terms and conditions of his supervised release order imposed on March 22, 9-362. The Court revokes, remands and sets aside defendant's supervised release. The defendant is committed to the custody of f Prisons for a period of TIM E SERVED. This term is to run consecutively to the term of imprisonment imposed in CR11-385. from imprisonment, the defendant is ...