IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 27, 2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
IMRAN AHMED MIR, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Carolyn K. Delaney United States Magistrate Judge
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2751
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY HEARING AND EXCLUDING TIME
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Jason Hitt, counsel for the plaintiff United States of America, and defendant Imran Ahmed MIR, by and through his counsel Douglas Beevers, Esq., that good cause exists to extend the preliminary hearing currently set for February 27, 2012, at 2:00 p.m. to March 27, 2012, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1(d).
Good cause exists to extend the time for the preliminary hearing within meaning of Rule 5.1(d) because the defendant received an initial production of discovery, including audio recordings and visual images from the drug purchases alleged in the Criminal Complaint. In addition, the parties have engaged in initial discussions about a possible pre-indictment resolution that would consolidate the current Criminal Complaint and an anticipated petition for violation of supervised release from the Probation Office. A pre-indictment resolution could benefit the defendant by significantly reducing his possible sentencing exposure in this case. For these reasons, the defendant agrees that a continuance of the preliminary hearing date will not prejudice him. Counsel believe a resolution on this case will occur if additional time to continue the preliminary hearing is granted.
The parties further stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding time from February 27, 2012, to March 27, 2012, so that counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). Specifically, the defense agrees that it needs additional time to continue discussions with the government regarding resolution of the case against this defendant, review the discovery recently produced in the case, effectively evaluate the posture of the case and potentially prepare for trial, and conduct further investigation into mitigation of the defendant's federal sentencing exposure in this case and the forthcoming petition for violations of supervised release. Id. For these reasons, the defendant, defense counsel, and the government stipulate and agree that the ends of justice outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A); Local Code T4.
ORDER Based upon the representations by counsel and the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Court finds good cause to extend the Preliminary Hearing in United States v. Mir, Case No. 2:12-mj-00034 CKD, from February 27, 2012, to March 27, 2012, at 2:00 p.m. pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1(d);
2. Based upon the representations and stipulation of the parties, the court finds that the time exclusion under 18 U.S.C.
18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and Local Code T4 applies and the ends of justice outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial based upon the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). Accordingly, time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded from February 27, 2012, up to and including March 27, 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.