The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Dana M. SABRAWUnited States District Judge
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF Nos. 8, 9)
Ruben Mijel Chavira ("Plaintiff"), a state inmate currently incarcerated at Kern Valley State Prison in Delano, California, and proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the Northern District of California on November 30, 2011.
United States District Judge Claudia Wilken determined that because Plaintiff's claims appear to have arisen while he was incarcerated at Calipatria State Prison, venue in the Northern District was improper; therefore, on December 6, 2011, she transferred the case to the Southern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (ECF No. 4).
Plaintiff did not prepaid the $350 filing fee mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to commence a civil action; nor did he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); therefore, on December 12, 2011, this Court dismissed the action, but granted Plaintiff leave to either prepay the civil filing fee or seek leave to proceed IFP. See Dec. 12, 2011 Order (ECF No. 7) at 2. Plaintiff was specifically directed to include "a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint" if he chose to proceed IFP, as is required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Id.
Plaintiff has since filed two Motions to Proceed IFP (ECF Nos. 8, 9), and has submitted a First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 10), as is his right under FED.R.CIV.P. 15(a), because no pleading has yet to be served upon any party.
I. MOTIONS TO PROCEED IFP
All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $350. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). "Under the PLRA [Prison Litigation Reform Act], all prisoners who file IFP civil actions must pay the full amount of the filing fee," regardless of whether the action is ultimately dismissed for any reason. See Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2)).
In order to comply with the PLRA, prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP must also submit a "certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint...." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). From the certified trust account statement, the Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), (4); see Taylor, 281 F.3d at 850. Thereafter, the institution having custody of the prisoner must collect subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding month's income, in any month in which the prisoner's account exceeds $10, and forward those payments to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
While Plaintiff has filed two Motions to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), he has not attached a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his Complaint to either one. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2. Section 1915(a)(2) clearly mandates that prisoners "seeking to bring a civil action ...without prepayment of fees ... shall submit a certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) ... for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) (emphasis added). Moreover, it appears the "Certificate of Funds" attached to both Motions--which must be signed by an officer authorized by the institution to certify that the trust account statement provided is a "true and correct copy" of the prisoner's assets--are not signed by "Counselor Moreno," a "Facility D-1 Unit Officer" but by Plaintiff himself. (ECF No. 9 at 5.)
Thus, because Plaintiff's trust account statements do not cover the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint, and neither of his Certificate of Funds is properly certified as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), the Court cannot accurately assess the appropriate amount of the filing fee which is statutorily required to initiate the prosecution of this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
For the reasons set forth above, IT IS ORDERED that:
(1) Plaintiff's Motions to Proceed IFP (ECF Nos. 8, 9) are DENIED and the action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prepay the $350 filing fee mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).
(2) Plaintiff is GRANTED an additional forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order to either: (a) pay the entire $350 filing fee, or (b) file a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his ...