Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Lauren Baumann

March 6, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
LAUREN BAUMANN
LAUREN DIONNE SUFFRIN



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Josephine Staton Tucker U. S. District Judge

Social Security No. 6 4 6 6

(Last 4 digits)

JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER

MONTH DAY YEAR

In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. MAR 05 2012

Amy Karlin, DFPD

(Name of Counsel)

X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.

NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY

There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Wire Fraud in violation of 18 USC § 1343 as charged in Count 1 of the Single-Count Information.

The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of:

Fifty-seven (57) months on the Single-Count Information.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which is due immediately. Any unpaid balance shall be due during the period of imprisonment, at the rate of not less than $25 per quarter, and pursuant to the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall pay restitution pursuant to 18 USC § 3664, in an amount to be determined pursuant to a restitution hearing, or as otherwise ordered by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Guideline Section 5E1.2(a), all fines are waived as the Court finds that the defendant has established that she is unable to pay and is not likely to become able to pay any fine.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of three years under the following terms and conditions:

The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;

The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, not to exceed eight tests per month, as directed by the Probation Officer;

During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and restitution in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;

The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant;

The defendant shall apply all monies received from income tax refunds, lottery winnings, inheritance, judgments and any anticipated or unexpected financial gains to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation;

The defendant shall obtain and maintain full-time conventional employment. The defendant shall submit all employment offers which the defendant intends to accept to the Probation Officer for prior approval so the Probation Officer can verify the legitimacy of the employment. The defendant shall keep the Probation Officer apprised of the defendant's work schedule;

The defendant shall not be employed in any capacity wherein she has custody, control, or management of her employer's funds; and

The defendant shall not be self-employed, or employed by a business owned by a family member or close personal friend, without prior approval of the Probation Officer. If the defendant is self-employed, or employed by a business owned by a family member or close personal friend, the defendant shall allow the Probation Officer to perform a reasonable number of random audits of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.