The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court Judge Northern District of California
David J. Lender (pro hac vice) (DL-1554) email@example.com 2 Eric S. Hochstadt (pro hac vice) (EH-0660) firstname.lastname@example.org 3 Kristen M. Echemendia (pro hac vice) (KE-0781) email@example.com 4 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 767 Fifth Avenue 5 New York, NY 10153 Telephone: (212) 310-8000 6 Facsimile: (212) 310 8007 7 Christopher J. Cox (Bar No. 151650) firstname.lastname@example.org 8 Liani Kotcher (Bar No. 277282) email@example.com 9 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Silicon Valley Office 10 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 11 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 12 Attorneys for Defendant StubHub, Inc. 13
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Current Date: March 30, 2012 New Date: June 29, 2012 Time: 10:30 am Courtroom: 7 -- 19th Floor Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
WHEREAS the Court's Case Management Conference Order, dated January 18, 2012, provides that a Case Management Conference shall be held on March 30, 2012 at 10:30 3 a.m. and that the parties' joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be due not less than 4 seven (7) days before that conference; 5
Show Cause"), and Plaintiff and Defendant submitted briefing on that issue on February 10, 2012 8 and February 17, 2012, respectively;
Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss"); and 12 time and expense associated with, a Case Management Conference and a Case Management Dismiss;
WHEREAS, on January 26, 2012, Your Honor issued an Order to Show Cause
Why the Complaint Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction ("Order to 7
WHEREAS, on February 17, 2012, Defendant also filed a Motion to Dismiss
WHEREAS the parties wish to avoid burdening the Court, and avoid incurring the Conference Statement until after the Court resolves the Order to Show Cause and the Motion to 14
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PARTIES, pursuant to L.R. 7-
12, to request that the Court continue the Case Management Conference until thirty (30) days 17 after the Court's rulings on the Order to Show Cause and the Motion to Dismiss, or, in the 18 alternative, until June 29, 2012 at 10:30 a.m. The parties further stipulate and request that the 19 deadline for the parties to file the joint Case Management Conference Statement be adjusted 20 accordingly until seven (7) days prior to the new date that the Court sets for the Case 21
There have been no other extensions of the Case Management Conference hearing date or 23 due date of the Case Management Statement. Counsel for Defendant attests under penalty of 24 perjury that counsel for Plaintiff concurs in the filing of this stipulated request.
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for March 30, 2012, is ...