Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Larry Mcreynolds v. Midland Credit Management

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 9, 2012

LARRY MCREYNOLDS,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Michael M. Anello United States District Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO DISMISS THE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [Doc. No. 23]

On April 21, 2011, Plaintiff Larry McReynolds filed a Complaint against Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq. [Doc. No. 1.] On June 1, 2011, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint ("FAC") [Doc. No. 10] and Defendant filed an answer to the FAC on June 20, 2011. [Doc. No. 12.] The following day, the Court scheduled an Early Neutral Evaluation ("ENE") to be held on August 23, 2011. [Doc. No. 14.] On July 12, 2011, Plaintiff requested to appear at the ENE by telephone. [Doc. No. 17.] On July 28, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiff's request and ordered Plaintiff to inform the Court of the telephone number at which he could be reached for the ENE. [Doc. No. 18.] Plaintiff failed to contact the Court with a telephone number, neglected to file an ENE statement, and did not appear at the ENE.

On August 23, 2011, the Court issued an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed on Plaintiff for his failure to participate by telephone in the Court ordered ENE and provide the Court with a telephone number at which he could be reached for the ENE. Plaintiff did not appear at the show cause hearing. [Doc. No. 20.] The Court's order to show cause warned Plaintiff that "failure to participate in this case, failure to appear at Court ordered hearings, and failure to abide by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, may result in the dismissal of his case." [Id.]

On November 7, 2011, Judge Gallo filed a thorough and well-reasoned Report containing findings and conclusions, upon which he bases his recommendation that the Court dismiss the action in its entirety with prejudice for failure to comply with Court orders. Neither party objected to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing objections has expired.

The Court has considered the pleadings, the procedural posture of the action, and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law. Accordingly, good cause appearing, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 23] in its entirety and DISMISSES the action with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is instructed to terminate the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120309

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.