Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Oracle America, Inc v. Micron Technology

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION


March 12, 2012

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Joseph C. Spero Judge

Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) David D. Cross (pro hac vice) Matthew J. McBurney (pro hac vice) CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 4 Telephone: 202-624-2500 Facsimile: 202-628-5116 5 E-mail: jmurphy@crowell.com dcross@crowell.com mmcburney@crowell.com Suzanne E. Rode (CA Bar No. 253830) CROWELL & MORING LLP 275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 9 Telephone: 415-986-2800 Facsimile: 415-986-2827 10 E-mail: srode@crowell.com 11 Counsel for Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc. 12

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2012, Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc. ("Oracle") and Defendants Micron Technology, Inc. and Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc.'s (collectively, 3 "Micron") filed a joint letter brief in connection with Micron's motion to compel the production 4 of documents responsive to Micron's Requests for Production No. 37 and 38 ("Requests") (Dkt. 5 No. 87). 6

WHEREAS, on February 10, 2012, a telephonic hearing was held before this Court 7 regarding the motion; 8 WHEREAS, on February 16, 2012, this Court issued a Discovery Order (Dkt. No. 91) ("Order") requiring Oracle to submit a declaration setting forth the search it conducted in 10 connection with the Requests and permitting the parties to submit briefing regarding the 11 adequacy of Oracle's search; 12

WHEREAS, Micron filed a brief contesting the adequacy of Oracle's search on March 2, 9 2012; 14

WHEREAS, the Order sets March 7, 2012 as the deadline for Oracle to submit a reply to Micron's brief; and

WHEREAS, Oracle believes that additional time may allow the parties to resolve some 15 17 or all of the concerns raised in Micron's brief without further need for intervention by this Court. 18

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Oracle's 19 reply shall be due on March 9, 2012. 20 21

IT IS SO STIPULATED

ATTESTATION OF FILING

Pursuant to General Oder No. 45 § X(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence 14 in the filing of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Briefing Schedule from all the 15 parties listed in the signature blocks above.

By: _/s/Matthew J. McBurney___________

Matthew J. McBurney

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. S DIST

United States Magistrate Judge Honorable Joseph

20120312

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.