Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jaime Aguirre v. Tribune Company

March 13, 2012

JAIME AGUIRRE
v.
TRIBUNE COMPANY, INC., ET AL.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable S. James Otero, United States District Judge

Priority Send Enter Closed JS-5/JS-6 Scan Only

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE S. JAMES OTERO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Victor Paul Cruz

Courtroom Clerk

COUNSEL PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF:

Not Present

Not Present

Court Reporter

COUNSEL PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

Not Present

PROCEEDINGS (in chambers): ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Tribune Company, Inc.'s ("Defendant") Notice of Removal ("Notice"), filed February 29, 2012. Plaintiff Jaime Aguirre ("Plaintiff") filed his Complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court on August 24, 2011. Defendant removed this matter from Los Angeles Superior Court on February 29, 2012, citing diversity jurisdiction. (Notice ¶ 1.)

This is not the first time that this case has been before this Court. On November 7, 2011, Defendant removed this action to federal court on grounds of diversity jurisdiction. (Notice ¶ 7.) On February 10, 2012, this Court, on its own motion, remanded the case to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that Defendant failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000. (Notice ¶ 9.) On February 9, 2012, Defendant received Plaintiff's initial discovery disclosures, which included a statement of damages verifying ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.