Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Michelle M. Woodward et al v. County of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 14, 2012

MICHELLE M. WOODWARD ET AL,
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable S. James Otero, United States District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE S. JAMES OTERO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Victor Paul Cruz Courtroom Clerk

Not Present

Court Reporter COUNSEL PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF(S): Not Present

COUNSEL PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT(S):

Not Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing by not later than March 21, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

The court will consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause, on or before the above date:

Proof of service of summons and complaint;

In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120314

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.