IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
March 14, 2012
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
DESIDORIO SANCHEZ SOLORZANO,
JOSE ANTONIO SANCHEZ REYES AND
ELIODORO CERRATO MARTINEZ,
ARTURO HERNANDEZ-M, Attorney at Law 15 South 34th St. San Jose, California 95116 Phone (408) 729-5785 Fax (408) 729-0167 California Bar No. 108980 Email: email@example.com Attorney for Defendant Desidorio Sanchez Solorzano
STIPULATION EXCLUDING TIME
FROM FEBRUARY 2, 2012, TO
APRIL 4, 2012, FROM THE SPEEDY
TRIAL ACT CALCULATOIN 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A)
On February 13, 2012, the parties appeared before the Court for a status conference. At the status conference, defense counsel requested additional time to review discovery in the case. The Court set the matter for a status conference on April 9, 2012. With the agreement of the parties, and with the consent of the defendants, the Court enters this order documenting the exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 from February 13, 2012, through April 9, 2012.
The parties agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:
1. The defendants agree to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act from
February 13, 2012, through April 9, 2012, based upon the need for effective preparation of counsel to provide the defendants an opportunity to continue discovery review. The defendants agree to this exclusion on the condition that their right to bring motions claiming Speedy Trial violations prior to February 13, 2012, shall remain preserved.
2. Counsel for defense believe that the exclusion of time is in their respective clients' best interest.
3. Given these circumstances, the Court finds that the ends f justice served by excluding the period from February 13, 2012, through April 9, 2012, outweigh the best interest of the public and defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
4. Accordingly, and with the consent of he defendants, the Court orders that the period from February 13, 2012, through April 9, 2012, shall be excluded from Speedy Trial Act calculations § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.