IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 16, 2012
GARRISON S. JOHNSON,
MATTHEW CATE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (Document #27)
On February 10, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion seeking the appointment of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Pursuant to § 1915(e)(1), "[t]he court may request an attorney to represent any person unable to afford counsel." This section applies to persons proceeding in forma pauperis. See Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist., 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). Plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis in this action, having paid the filing fee in full. Thus, the Court lacks statutory authority to appoint counsel to represent Plaintiff.
For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel is HEREBY DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.