Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Eliodoro Guzman-Arreguin

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 16, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ELIODORO GUZMAN-ARREGUIN,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender ERIC V. KERSTEN, Bar #226429 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service 2300 Tulare Street, Suite 330 Fresno, California 93721-2226 Telephone: (559) 487-5561 Attorney for Defendant Eliodoro Guzman-Arreguin

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Date: May 7, 2012 Time: 10:00 a.m.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, IAN A. GARRIQUES, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for plaintiff, and ERIC V. KERSTEN, Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for defendant, Eliodoro Guzman-Arreguin, that the date for sentencing may be continued to May 7, 2012, or the soonest date thereafter that is convenient to the court. The date currently set for sentencing is April 23, 2012. The requested new date is May 7, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.

Due to unanticipated delays in completing Mr. Guzman-Arrreguin's presentence interview additional time is necessary to allow for to completion the Presentence Investigation Report and any objections and/or responses thereto prior to the sentencing date.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the requested continuance shall be excluded as necessary for effective defense preparation, and also for continuity of counsel, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20120316

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.