UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 20, 2012
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Barbara A. McAuliffe United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 52) FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Gregory McKinney ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on the first amended complaint, filed November 24, 2009, against Defendants Castro, Harrington, Hedgpeth, Kays, and Soto for deliberate indifference to a serious risk to Plaintiff's health in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on December 12, 2012. (ECF No. 52.) On January 30, 2012, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion for a thirty day extension of time to file an opposition. (ECF No. 54.) More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l).
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order; and
2. The failure to respond to Defendants' motion in compliance with this order will result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.