IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 21, 2012
JEREMY JAMISON, PLAINTIFF,
BAILLIE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On September 22, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
On July 27, 2011, the parties filed a stipulation regarding plaintiff's requests for injunctive relief. (ECF Nos. 114, 118 &122). The court has reviewed the stipulation and also finds it appropriate.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 22, 2011, are adopted in full;
2. Defendants' August 22, 2011 motion to dismiss is denied as moot;
3. The parties' stipulation regarding injunctive relief (ECF No. 122) is adopted; and
4. Plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 104, 114 & 118) are denied as moot.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.