Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rosyln Mccoy v. Honorable John M. Mchugh

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 22, 2012

ROSYLN MCCOY,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
HONORABLE JOHN M. MCHUGH, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, DEFENDANT.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney TODD A. PICKLES LYNN TRINKA ERNCE Assistant United States Attorneys 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 Attorneys for the Secretary of the Army

PARTIES' JOINT REQUEST FOR FURTHER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER

Trial: May 14, 2012

JOINT REQUEST

The parties have met and conferred with respect to a further settlement conference in this matter, and agree that further settlement discussions are appropriate at this time. With the consent of counsel for Plaintiff, counsel for the Secretary has contacted the chambers of the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, who presided over the previous settlement conference, and has been informed that the Court is available for a settlement conference on April 2, 2012, which is also available for counsel for the parties. Magistrate Judge Drozd has informed the parties that the conference will be limited to no more than three hours, and both parties agree with that limitation. Accordingly, the parties hereby jointly request that this matter be set for a further settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Drozd on April 2, 2012 at a time to be set by the Court.

Respectfully submitted,

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Parties' Joint Request for Further Settlement Conference. For good cause showing, the Court hereby SETS the matter for a Further Settlement Conference on April 2, 2012 before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd. The Court shall issue a minute order setting the time of the further settlement conference. Because the parties have already submitted settlement conference statements, they are not required to submit additional statements but are permitted to do so.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20120322

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.